[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sysfs makes scaling suck Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:45:24PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> But also, the sysfs with over 4,000 (and higher) devices was
> specifically checked by OSDL (actually as part of the CGL testing) some
> of the Manoj changes (for unpinning entries etc) were needed to get it
> to function, but as of now, I believe an enterprise scaling test works
> reasonably well for it ... there certainly wasn't any evidence of it
> dying horribly in the tests.

i386 exhausts lowmem very quickly. SCSI is in a bit better shape than
network devices as the multiplier is only around 4 compared to 16 for network

My point stands, though. Forcing every new feature to go in via sysfs is
not the right thing to do. Some people don't/can't use it, please remember

"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <>.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-17 19:53    [W:0.062 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site