lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/44 take 2] [UBI] startup code
From
Date
Christoph,

On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:44 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So both I and Rusty told you not to do this and you did it anyway.
>
> I'm quite pissed about this ignorance. Andrew, what do we do about such
> a case? Should we just revert ubi until they fixed their mess up?

Just for reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/19/67

Sorry, I thought Rusty meant that we can use it if we invent our own
type, see the first part of his answer. You did not answer Frank's mail
about _why_ we use it. So I thought you agreed with us, I did not ignore
you, no need to be so assertive.

It is not a problem to fix this, but neither Rusty nor you explained
what is wrong with that call. But we _did_ explain why we use it. You
ignored the explanation and the questions.

--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-17 17:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans