lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/44 take 2] [UBI] startup code
    From
    Date
    Christoph,

    On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:44 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > So both I and Rusty told you not to do this and you did it anyway.
    >
    > I'm quite pissed about this ignorance. Andrew, what do we do about such
    > a case? Should we just revert ubi until they fixed their mess up?

    Just for reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/19/67

    Sorry, I thought Rusty meant that we can use it if we invent our own
    type, see the first part of his answer. You did not answer Frank's mail
    about _why_ we use it. So I thought you agreed with us, I did not ignore
    you, no need to be so assertive.

    It is not a problem to fix this, but neither Rusty nor you explained
    what is wrong with that call. But we _did_ explain why we use it. You
    ignored the explanation and the questions.

    --
    Best regards,
    Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-17 17:09    [W:0.022 / U:0.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site