[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/44 take 2] [UBI] startup code
    On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:58:28AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > > Why not? We tried to avoid this but found out that this is the most
    > > decent interface. Specific advises are welcome.
    > because this type of compount interface is really painful for the user.
    > the module.param=foo syntax makes sure paramaters can be used without
    > endless documentation for each and every single of them, and makes
    > sure module writers don't introduce bugs in their own parser reimplementations.
    > Rusty, was it intentional that drivers can use __module_param_call?
    > Do you think the ubi use here is okay?

    So both I and Rusty told you not to do this and you did it anyway.

    I'm quite pissed about this ignorance. Andrew, what do we do about such
    a case? Should we just revert ubi until they fixed their mess up?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-17 16:47    [W:0.019 / U:24.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site