lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/44 take 2] [UBI] startup code
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:58:28AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Why not? We tried to avoid this but found out that this is the most
> > decent interface. Specific advises are welcome.
> because this type of compount interface is really painful for the user.
> the module.param=foo syntax makes sure paramaters can be used without
> endless documentation for each and every single of them, and makes
> sure module writers don't introduce bugs in their own parser reimplementations.
>
> Rusty, was it intentional that drivers can use __module_param_call?
> Do you think the ubi use here is okay?

So both I and Rusty told you not to do this and you did it anyway.

I'm quite pissed about this ignorance. Andrew, what do we do about such
a case? Should we just revert ubi until they fixed their mess up?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-17 16:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans