[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:19 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:07:05 -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
    > >
    > > I've been semi watching this, and the only comment I really can give
    > > is that I hate the name. To me, logfs implies a filesystem for
    > > logging purposes, not for Flash hardware with wear leveling issues to
    > > be taken into account.
    > Yeah, well, ...
    > Two years ago when I started all this, I was looking for a good name.
    > All I could come up with sounded stupid, so I picked "LogFS" as a code
    > name. As soon as I find a better name, the code name should get
    > replaced.
    > By now I still don't have anything better. All alternatives that were
    > proposed are just as bad - with the added disadvantage of being new and
    > not established yet. My hope of ever finding a better name is nearly
    > zero.

    Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to
    the name than either of its predecessors :)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-16 06:57    [W:0.020 / U:20.272 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site