lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: filesystem benchmarking fun
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:25:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:11:56 -0400
> Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > At least on ext3, it may help to sort the blocks under io for
> > flushing...it may not. A bigger log would definitely help, but I would
> > say the mkfs defaults should be reasonable for a workload this simple.
> >
> > (data=writeback was used for my ext3 numbers).
>
> When ext3 runs out of journal space it needs to sync lots of metadata out
> to the fs so that its space in the journal can be reclaimed. That metadata
> is of course splattered all over the place so it's seekstorm time.
>
> The filesystem does take some care to place the metadata blocks "close" to
> the data blocks. But of course if we're writing all the pagecache and then
> we later separately go back and write the metadata then that would screw
> things up.

Just to clarify, in the initial stage where kernel trees are created,
benchmark doesn't call sync. So all the writeback is through the normal
async mechanisms.

>
> I put some code in there which will place indirect blocks under I/O at
> the same time as their data blocks, so everything _should_ go out in a
> nice slurp (see write_boundary_block()). The first thing to do here
> is to check that write_boundary_block() didn't get broken.

write_boundary_block should get called from pdflush and the IO done by
pdflush seems to be pretty sequential. But, in this phase the
vast majority of the files are small (95% are less than 46k).
>
> If that's still working then the problem will _probably_ be directory
> writeout. Possibly inodes, but they should be well-laid-out.
>
> Were you using dir_index? That might be screwing things up.

Yes, dir_index. A quick test of mkfs.ext3 -O ^dir_index seems to still
have the problem. Even though the inodes are well laid out, is the
order they get written sane? Looks like ext3 is just walking a list of
bh/jh, maybe we can just sort the silly thing?

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-16 21:19    [W:0.063 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site