lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2
Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> The safest approach I can think of is making
>>> dentries for attributes unreclaimable but those are made reclaimable for
>>> good reasons. :-(
>> Yeah, that was the google workaround. It's OK unless you happen to have
>> thousands of disks on an ia32 box.
>
> I see. I thought there was different approach on fixing the problem.
> I'll try to backport the synchronization fix but am afraid it can be too
> risky for -stable. If it seems too risky, I'll send a patch to disable
> reclamation.
>

Realistically, how can disabling the reclamation be worse than what's
there now?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-16 18:11    [W:0.127 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site