Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 May 2007 12:06:35 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: Oops and Panics in 2.6.21.1, 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.19.2 |
| |
Tejun Heo wrote: >>> The safest approach I can think of is making >>> dentries for attributes unreclaimable but those are made reclaimable for >>> good reasons. :-( >> Yeah, that was the google workaround. It's OK unless you happen to have >> thousands of disks on an ia32 box. > > I see. I thought there was different approach on fixing the problem. > I'll try to backport the synchronization fix but am afraid it can be too > risky for -stable. If it seems too risky, I'll send a patch to disable > reclamation. >
Realistically, how can disabling the reclamation be worse than what's there now?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |