Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 May 2007 12:01:06 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: filesystem benchmarking fun |
| |
Chris Mason wrote: > For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute. compilebench shows the > default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch of > kernel trees. Dave Chinner gave me some mount options that make it > dramatically better, but it still writes at 10MB/s on a sata drive that > can do 80MB/s. Ext3 is better, but still only 20MB/s. >
Now try JFS. My lawn grows faster than it can write a new kernel tree.
What we need is a tool that shows *why* this stuff happens...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |