[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Oops and Panics in, and
Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> a number of people have hit that, on and off.
>> Yeah, I've been seeing that one. It should have been fixed with the big
>> fat patchset.
> Great - fingers crossed.
>>> We were close to having a fix, I think, but then we decided that great
>>> chunks of sysfs needed rewriting and I believe that we believe that this
>>> great rewrite will fix this bug.
>> How were we gonna fix it? If it isn't too complex, I can cook up a
>> patch for -stable series.
> Do we actually understand the causes?

Yeah, I think I do. Basically, the problem is that on-demand attach and
reclamation update sd->s_dentry but accesses to it aren't synchronized
properly. In the big fat patchset, first I tried to fix it by removing
sd->s_dentry completely which didn't work because of shadow nodes, so
the second try was to fix the synchronization which is in -mm now.

>> The safest approach I can think of is making
>> dentries for attributes unreclaimable but those are made reclaimable for
>> good reasons. :-(
> Yeah, that was the google workaround. It's OK unless you happen to have
> thousands of disks on an ia32 box.

I see. I thought there was different approach on fixing the problem.
I'll try to backport the synchronization fix but am afraid it can be too
risky for -stable. If it seems too risky, I'll send a patch to disable

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-16 17:45    [W:0.118 / U:6.592 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site