[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:09:19PM +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 11:19 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > The start and end points passed to block_prepare_write() delimit the region of
> > the page that is going to be modified. This means that prepare_write()
> > doesn't need to fill it in if the page is not up to date.
> Really? Is it _really_ going to be modified? Even if the pointer
> userspace gave to write() is bogus, and is going to fault half-way
> through the copy_from_user()?

This is why there are so many variations on copy_from_user that zero on
faults. One way or another, the prepare_write/commit_write pair are
responsible for filling it in.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-16 14:59    [W:0.085 / U:2.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site