Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 May 2007 07:21:59 +0200 | From | Jarek Poplawski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable |
| |
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:08:12AM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 05/15, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > I've overheared somebody is talking about my favorite 2-nd bit! ... > We already discussed this... Surely, we can do this. I believe > this will complicate (and _imho_ uglify) the code too much.
Yes, but now I see you are about to change your mind about this bit...
> May be I am wrong. Please provide a detailed description?
I'll try too look more at your solution - maybe it's "not so bad". I've probably exaggerated yesterday about this overhead of setting the VALID bit.
Cheers, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |