lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: __must_check (stir the pot :-))
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> where sysfs_create_file() is marked __must_check and sysdev_create_file()
> isn't.
>
> So the questions come to mind: Do we really care if our core
> infrastructure doesn't? Can we care if the core infrastructure doesn't
> propogate the error returns?


Yes, we should propagate the markers as needed...

Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-15 11:19    [W:0.047 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site