[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ARM] Fix hard_smp_processor_id compile error
    On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 09:19:07AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
    > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:18:50AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
    > > "Remove hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id on UP systems",
    > > 2f4dfe206a2fc07099dfad77a8ea2f4b4ae2140f in Linus' tree, moved
    > > the definition of hard_smp_processor_id linux/smp.h to asm/smp.h
    > > for UP systems. This causes a regression on ARM as the definition
    > > was not added to asm-arm/smp.h.
    > >
    > > Cc: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <>
    > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <>
    > I took an alternative approach - since Integrator never had the complete
    > SMP support merged, I ripped it out of that platform. Whether realview
    > suffers from the same thing or not I'm not sure - uniprocessor realview
    > is not something covered by the ARM default configuration files, and
    > therefore kautobuild won't check that configuration.

    I can take a look into this. Is there a tree other than Linus'
    I should be working with?

    > However, the things I find annoying about this is:
    > 1. asm/smp.h was _never_ included in ARM UP builds prior to this change.
    > 2. we have linux/smp.h and the general rule is that if asm/foo.h and
    > linux/foo.h are present, linux/foo.h is included in preference to
    > asm/foo.h
    > Given the amount of janitors we now have looking at the kernel code,
    > (2) is a big concern - it could mean a constant stream of patches
    > trying to "fix" files including asm/smp.h.
    > I would suggest that if there is a desire to include asm/smp.h on UP
    > builds, the inclusion of it by linux/smp.h is made unconditional.

    I was thinking that myself, though I'm kind of fearful of
    what kind of (additional) breakage it might cause.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-15 11:11    [W:0.021 / U:1.432 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site