[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Freezeable workqueues [Was: 2.6.22-rc1: Broken suspend on SMP with tifm]
    On Tuesday, 15 May 2007 02:56, Alex Dubov wrote:
    > >
    > > > > - Do we need freezeable workqueues ?
    > > >
    > > > Well, we have at least one case in which they appear to be useful.
    > >
    > I need freezeable wq exactly for the fact that they are synchronized with suspend/resume. My
    > workitem may do device_register/unregister and it can (and will be) scheduled from irq handler
    > during resume. As far as I understand, before freezeable wqs, kthreads were the only way to
    > achieve this behavior,

    That's correct.

    > which is less convenient.

    Thanks for the explanation.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-15 22:51    [W:0.024 / U:6.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site