Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Mon, 14 May 2007 15:05:16 +0530 | | From | "Satyam Sharma" <> | | Subject | Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? |
| |
Hi,
On 5/13/07, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 11:10 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > - depends on SCSI > > > + depends on SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
This is incorrect, alright, but not because of any of the reasons James mentions below.
The only reason why some module (or Kconfig option) should _depend_ on some other Kconfig option is if (*and only if*) it re-uses _code_ exported by said dependency.
In this particular case, SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y/n only controls the default value of some variable somewhere in SCSI, so no other code can meaningfully "depend" on it.
> > No. SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is a bool ... if you depend on it, you'll force the > > wait scan to be built in, which isn't the idea at all.
Umm, this isn't true, actually.
> Plus SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default* for async scanning. You > can alter this at boot time, so you could need the wait scan module even > with it set to N.
I think the _correct_ way to handle this situation (and which would make everyone happy here; Robert can get his module-free builds with defconfig, James gets his SCSI_WAIT_SCAN module even if nobody asked for it explicitly) would be as follows:
---
Clean up Kconfig entry for CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig --- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2007-05-10 23:19:32.000000000 +0530 +++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2007-05-14 15:12:46.000000000 +0530 @@ -243,9 +243,8 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN tristate - default m - depends on SCSI - depends on MODULES + default m if SCSI=m + default n
menu "SCSI Transports" depends on SCSI - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |