Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 May 2007 22:35:47 +0200 | From | "Jan Blunck" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/14] ext3 whiteout support |
| |
On 5/14/07, Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> wrote: > On May 14, 2007 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV 0x0008 /* Journal device */ > > #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 > > +#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_WHITEOUT 0x0020 > > Is this flag reserved with Ted? It isn't listed in the e2fsprogs repo. >
I don't know. I tried to contact him a few weeks ago but failed. Guess, maybe he isn't reading the @thunk.org email anymore which was reference in the e2fsprogs source I used.
Ted, from ext2_fs.h I learn that the value 0x0020 is left unused.
#define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080
Is this intentionally?
Cheers, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |