Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 May 2007 15:35:55 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version |
| |
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:07:39 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > Yeah, I expect quite a few people will start seeing that. iirc it was > > triggered by a couple of changes: a local_irq_save/local_irq_restore > > in sched_clock() and a change Jeremy made to the softlockup detector. > > hm, i specifically asked to not do local_irq_save/restore in > sched_clock(). It's the _scheduler_ clock and it very absolutely > positively needs no flags save/restore. >
It got taken out again.
It doesn't matter though: a local_irq_save/restore in some callee shouldn't cause the locking API tests to break. And they're apparently now breaking without that local_irq_save/restore in there anyway.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |