lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic - updated version
On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:07:39 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I expect quite a few people will start seeing that. iirc it was
> > triggered by a couple of changes: a local_irq_save/local_irq_restore
> > in sched_clock() and a change Jeremy made to the softlockup detector.
>
> hm, i specifically asked to not do local_irq_save/restore in
> sched_clock(). It's the _scheduler_ clock and it very absolutely
> positively needs no flags save/restore.
>

It got taken out again.

It doesn't matter though: a local_irq_save/restore in some callee shouldn't
cause the locking API tests to break. And they're apparently now breaking
without that local_irq_save/restore in there anyway.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-14 00:39    [W:0.130 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site