[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] lguest guest feedback tidyups
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:56 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:21:30AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > 1) send-dma and bind-dma hypercall wrappers for drivers to use,
> > 2) formalization of the convention that devices can use the irq
> > corresponding to their index on the lguest_bus.
> > 3) ___force to shut up sparse: guests *can* use ioremap as virtual mem.
> No, they can't. Even if in your case the underlying address spaces
> happen to be the same anything returned by ioremap must use the proper
> accessors. That's the whole point of having this separation, otherwise
> you wouldn't need to use ioremap at all.

Hi Christoph!

Well, without ioremap, the memory wouldn't normally be mapped. Is
there something better to use?

> So instead of sprinkling cast
> around add lguest_read*/lguest_write* accessors that do the __force cast
> once and make sure the ioremap return value is always accessed using those.

And that's nothing to do with iremap. They're required because guest
"physical" == host virtual, and casting a long to a "__user void *"
seems to require a __force.

I enjoy a good Hellwigging as much as anyone, but your aim is off.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-11 09:33    [W:0.116 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site