[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Scalable reader/writer lock.
> Its scalable in that the read count is a percpu counter and the reader fast
> path does not write to a shared cache-line.
> Its not FIFO fair, but starvation proof by alternating readers and writers.

While this implementation looks pretty nice I really hate growing more
and more locking primitives. Do we have any rwsem user that absolutley
needs FIFO semantics or could we convert all user over (in which case
the objection above is of course completely moot)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-11 16:07    [W:0.168 / U:5.644 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site