lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote:
> And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to
> accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted
> bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new
> hardware support.
>
> If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have
> no objection to that. But until then, I think the rules that we have
> had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect.

I have to agree. I went back through my mbox and found vanishingly few
pci_id update patches. So it's not clear there's even a big issue.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-02 02:57    [W:3.237 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site