[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?
    On Tue, 01 May 2007 17:30:36 +0200, Andre Tomt said:
    > Robert P. J. Day wrote:

    > >

    > Already documented in the kernel tarball, see
    > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt

    Robert's point is that the file you cited is horrendously out of date, and
    we need to create a consensus of what *should* be in feature-removal-schedule.txt
    so we can update it to correspond to some sort of reality, or at the very least
    some politically correct sanitized view of reality. It currently lists
    stuff scheduled to be removed 18 months ago, and doesn't list stuff that
    everybody agrees deserves to be heaved over the side as soon as the users have
    had "enough warning" (whatever that means)....
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-01 18:39    [W:0.020 / U:174.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site