lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans -- vm bugfixes
Andrew Morton wrote:

> mm-simplify-filemap_nopage.patch
> mm-fix-fault-vs-invalidate-race-for-linear-mappings.patch
> mm-merge-populate-and-nopage-into-fault-fixes-nonlinear.patch
> mm-merge-nopfn-into-fault.patch
> convert-hugetlbfs-to-use-vm_ops-fault.patch
> mm-remove-legacy-cruft.patch
> mm-debug-check-for-the-fault-vs-invalidate-race.patch

> mm-fix-clear_page_dirty_for_io-vs-fault-race.patch

> Miscish MM changes. Will merge, dependent upon what still applies and works
> if the moveable-zone patches get stalled.

These fix some bugs in the core vm, at least the former one we have
seen numerous people hitting in production...

I don't suppose you mean these are logically dependant on new features
sitting below them in your patch stack, just that you don't want to
spend time fixing a lot of rejects? If so, I can help fix those up, but
I don't think there is anything major, IIRC the biggest annoyance is
just that changing some GFP_types throws some big hunks.

So, do you or anyone else have any problems with these patches going in
2.6.22? I haven't had much feedback for a while, but I was under the
impression that people are more-or-less happy with them?

mm-fix-fault-vs-invalidate-race-for-linear-mappings.patch

This patch fixes the core filemap_nopage vs invalidate_inode_pages2
race by having filemap_nopage return a locked page to do_no_page,
and removes the fairly complex (and inadequate) truncate_count
synchronisation logic.

There were concerns that we could do this more cheaply, but I think it
is important to start with a base that is simple and more likely to
be correct and build on that. My testing didn't show any obvious
problems with performance.

mm-merge-populate-and-nopage-into-fault-fixes-nonlinear.patch
mm-merge-nopfn-into-fault.patch
etc.

These move ->nopage, ->populate, ->nopfn (and soon, ->page_mkwrite)
into a single, unified interface. Although this strictly closes some
similar holes in nonlinear faults as well, they are very uncommon, so
I wouldn't be so upset if these aren't merged in 2.6.22 (I don't see
any reason not to, but at least they don't fix major bugs).

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-01 10:47    [W:0.547 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site