Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:12:34 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest |
| |
* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's: > > > > - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect > > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously! > > Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can > you send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can > take a bit for the throttle to catch them all.
ah, indeed - i ran 10 of them and letting them run for a bit smoothes things out.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |