On 04/04/2007 07:48 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

>> But in general, it would be nice to have an easy way to find a
>> maintainer (not author) from a module binary, and I agree
>> MODULE_MAINTAINER can work well for such a purpose.  It's no mandatory
>> field, but could be some help.
> 
> Yes, it would be nice.
> 
> But would this information always be kept up-to-date for the whole tree?
> I don't see this happen.

I believe it would largely stay up to date yes. The tag wouldn't be 
mandatory and adding oneself as a MODULE_MAINTAINER would specifically 
be saying "yes, I want to look after this thing". If someone then no 
longer wants to, getting rid of the tag is a matter of deleting one 
line. I wouldn't be worse than MAINTAINERS, and being inline, I expect 
it to be better...

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/