[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 04/17] Add pagetable accessors to pack and unpack pagetable entries
    On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:25:57 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    > Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > What do the benchmarks say with CONFIG_PARAVIRT on native hardware
    > > compared to !CONFIG_PARAVIRT. e.g. does lmbench suffer?
    > Barely. There's a slight hit for not using patching, and patching is
    > almost identical to native performance. The most noticeable difference
    > is in the null syscall microbenchmark, but once you get to complex
    > things the difference is in the noise.

    Why is there a difference for null syscall? I had assumed we patched all the
    fast path cases relevant there. Do you have an idea where it comes from?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-04 13:51    [W:0.020 / U:13.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site