[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Yeah, a new-id patch is a pretty critical bugfix if you happen to have that
> hardware. I'll get all these into 2.6.22 by whatever means and will adopt
> your advice in future.
> Probably these should go into -stable too, but I don't know what
> Greg&Chris's position is on new device IDs.

I don't know either. But a one-line ID patch is pretty painless
considering the gain, so I would vote for taking such

If it's more than one line added per ID though, NAK for -stable, IMO...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-01 02:27    [W:0.163 / U:13.148 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site