lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
Satyam Sharma wrote:
[...]
> The rationale is to make the operator prominent and thus make
> the structure of a complex multi-line compound conditional expression more
> readable and obvious at first glance itself. For example, consider:
>
> if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
> smallcond2 &&
> (conditionnumber3a ||
> condition3b)) {
> ...
> }
>
> versus
>
> if (veryverylengthycondition1
> && smallcond2
> && (conditionnumber3a
> || condition3b)) {
> ...
> }
>
> ?
>
> Latter wins, doesn't it?

I find the latter more sensible too, even though I used the former
myself until recently (because I didn't knew better).
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= ----=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-01 00:27    [W:0.377 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site