Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Tue, 03 Apr 2007 08:11:50 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 08:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > Try two instances of chew.c at _differing_ nice levels on one cpu on > > > mainline, and then SD. This is why you can't renice X on mainline. > > > > How about something more challenging instead :) > > > > The numbers below are from my scheduler tree with massive_intr running > > at nice 0, and chew at nice 5. Below these numbers are 100 lines from > > the exact center of chew's output. > > > > (interactivity remains intact with this rather heavy load) > > looks interesting - could you send the patch?
Sorry, that tree is not _even_ ready for viewing yet. (and it's got an occasional oops bug i have to kill)
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |