[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] msi: Immediately mask and unmask msi-x irqs.
    On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:41:49AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > When we mask or unmask a msi-x irqs the writes may be posted because
    > we are writing to memory mapped region. This means the mask and
    > unmask don't happen immediately but at some unspecified time in the
    > future. Which is out of sync with how the mask/unmask logic work
    > for ioapic irqs.
    > The practical result is that we get very subtle and hard to track down
    > irq migration bugs.
    > This patch performs a read flush after writes to the MSI-X table for mask
    > and unmask operations. Since the SMP affinity is set while the interrupt
    > is masked, and since it's unmasked immediately after, no additional flushes
    > are required in the various affinity setting routines.

    set_msi_irq_affinity() is already doing read_msi_msg(). So the mask operation
    before this should atleast get flushed before we modify the irq destination

    With this patch however, unmask happens immediately.

    > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
    > index ad33e01..435c195 100644
    > --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
    > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
    > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static void msi_set_mask_bit(unsigned int irq, int flag)
    > int offset = entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
    > writel(flag, entry->mask_base + offset);
    > + readl(entry->mask_base + offset);

    Don't we need the flush for the PCI_CAP_ID_MSI case aswell.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-03 20:55    [W:0.037 / U:45.732 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site