Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:45:37 -0700 | | From | "Paul Menage" <> | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem |
| |
On 4/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers > patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving > containers into nsproxy? Has any other development been going on? > Paul, have you made any updates?
I've not made major changes since the last patch post, just some small optimizations and fixes - I've been too tied up with other stuff.
Whilst I've got no objection in general to using nsproxy rather than the container_group object that I introduced in my latest patches, I think that Vatsa's approach of losing the general container object is flawed, since it loses any kind of per-group generic state (e.g. "this container is being deleted") and last time I saw it, I think it would tend to lose processes so that they didn't show up in any directory in the container fs.
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |