Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:34:59 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| |
David Lang wrote: > I'll say that as a user I hate having to deal with bugzilla. > > there's nothing more frustrating then spending a good chunk of time > trying to find a similar bug, then jumping through all the bugzilla > hoops to file a report to eventually (days/weeks later) get a message > 'closed becouse it's a duplicate report), then have to go and track down > what it's a duplicate of, read through that bug report, only to find > that it's not solved there either, and to top it off, the people working > on that bug won't see my report or that I'm available to troubleshoot it.
Ideally, joining duplicate reports should be a low-cost, lossless operation.
That said, when bug B is marked as duplicate of bug A, people at bug A at least get a link to bug B, aren't they? If they are too lazy to read the report B, they obviously are not very interested in A either. Tough luck. Vice versa, people at bug B get notified that the matter is now continued at bug A and can add their Cc there. Of course that addition is one of the very few things that could probably be automated.
Joining duplicate reports at a mailinglist involves responding to multiple threads and send links into web archives of the list, which happens to be redundant to and disparate from your local e-mail storage. I can't see how this aspect of bug-handling works easier on mailinglists.
> from a user poit of view, e-mailing the kernel list (retrying a few days > later of there is no response) tends to work _much_ better.
What I from a maintainer's POV agree with is that a report to the appropriate mailinglist is often easier to triage than a report at bugzilla, because the reporter often needs initial help to properly define the problem. Bugzilla becomes useful after a report reached a minimum level of quality (after minimum initial triage) and if the bug can be clearly associated with a maintained subsystem of the kernel (as e.g. Linus already pointed out in this thread). -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-- ===-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |