Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:48:28 +0200 | From | "Michal Piotrowski" <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| |
On 30/04/07, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > Right. Simply because these lists are assembled by someone > > > > - who knows how to pick that reports from the mailinglists > > - who knows how to sort them in a useful way > > - who knows how to add the relevant folks on CC > > That all needs to be done by someone initially yes. But then tracking what happens > afterwards is something that can be distributed. A difficult bug can take a long > time to resolve and generate a lot of messages; you don't want to require > the initial sorter to handle all that too. > > It's much more scalable to let the developers update the state themselves > then once they handle the bug.
The actual list of known regressions is wiki based. Everyone can update bug status, add references etc.
From time to time, I'll send this list to right people.
> > -Andi >
Regards, Michal
-- Michal K. K. Piotrowski Kernel Monkeys (http://kernel.wikidot.com/start) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |