lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.21 reiserfs -- cicular locking?
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:40:14 -0700 David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

> This might be a Heisenberg, but I figure it's worth posting
> in case anyone else sees similar oddness. Never seen it
> before or since. It's as if a gremlin got annoyed with me
> for switching a filesystem from reiser to ext3. :)
>
> - Dave
>
>
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.21-git #6
> -------------------------------------------------------
> vi/4556 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&REISERFS_SB(s)->xattr_dir_sem){..--}, at: [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8026c4fa>] chown_common+0x93/0xb3
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&inode->i_mutex){--..}:
> [<ffffffff802405f4>] __lock_acquire+0x9f7/0xbaa
> [<ffffffff802ca1ac>] get_xa_root+0x49/0x107
> [<ffffffff80240822>] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9f
> [<ffffffff802ca1ac>] get_xa_root+0x49/0x107
> [<ffffffff8023dee0>] save_trace+0x40/0x9e
> [<ffffffff8041e1db>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xd8/0x281
> [<ffffffff8041ff18>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x4a
> [<ffffffff802ca1ac>] get_xa_root+0x49/0x107
> [<ffffffff802ca2a8>] open_xa_dir+0x1c/0xf8
> [<ffffffff8041f34b>] __down_read+0x34/0x9d
> [<ffffffff802cb50a>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x64/0x185
> [<ffffffff802fd620>] _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x14/0x34
> [<ffffffff802b252e>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x38/0xae
> [<ffffffff8027f6bc>] generic_delete_inode+0x64/0xf5
> [<ffffffff802b24f6>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x0/0xae
> [<ffffffff8027f6d2>] generic_delete_inode+0x7a/0xf5
> [<ffffffff80276b95>] do_unlinkat+0xd9/0x14f
> [<ffffffff8023f75f>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x123/0x14d
> [<ffffffff8041f4d1>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x37
> [<ffffffff8020954e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->xattr_dir_sem){..--}:
> [<ffffffff8023ee6f>] print_circular_bug_header+0xcc/0xd3
> [<ffffffff802404f0>] __lock_acquire+0x8f3/0xbaa
> [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
> [<ffffffff80240822>] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9f
> [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
> [<ffffffff8023bb03>] down_read+0x32/0x3b
> [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
> [<ffffffff8022e285>] __capable+0x9/0x1d
> [<ffffffff802b2828>] reiserfs_setattr+0x11e/0x1ec
> [<ffffffff8022bd6b>] current_fs_time+0x35/0x3a
> [<ffffffff802803a1>] notify_change+0x122/0x231
> [<ffffffff8026c505>] chown_common+0x9e/0xb3
> [<ffffffff8026e7a6>] fget+0x88/0xa7
> [<ffffffff8026c54a>] sys_fchown+0x30/0x47
> [<ffffffff8020954e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 1 lock held by vi/4556:
> #0: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8026c4fa>] chown_common+0x93/0xb3
>
> stack backtrace:
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8023eacc>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x69/0x72
> [<ffffffff8023ee6f>] print_circular_bug_header+0xcc/0xd3
> [<ffffffff802404f0>] __lock_acquire+0x8f3/0xbaa
> [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
> [<ffffffff80240822>] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9f
> [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
> [<ffffffff8023bb03>] down_read+0x32/0x3b
> [<ffffffff802caf4b>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x5b/0x128
> [<ffffffff8022e285>] __capable+0x9/0x1d
> [<ffffffff802b2828>] reiserfs_setattr+0x11e/0x1ec
> [<ffffffff8022bd6b>] current_fs_time+0x35/0x3a
> [<ffffffff802803a1>] notify_change+0x122/0x231
> [<ffffffff8026c505>] chown_common+0x9e/0xb3
> [<ffffffff8026e7a6>] fget+0x88/0xa7
> [<ffffffff8026c54a>] sys_fchown+0x30/0x47
> [<ffffffff8020954e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
>

cc added. This was also reported againt -rc7-mm1 (or 2)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-27 07:47    [W:7.075 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site