Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] unprivileged mounts update | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Date | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:29:40 +0200 |
| |
> So then as far as you're concerned, the patches which were in -mm will > remain unchanged?
Basically yes. I've merged the update patch, which was not yet added to -mm, did some cosmetic code changes, and updated the patch headers.
There's one open point, that I think we haven't really explored, and that is the propagation semantics. I think you had the idea, that a propagated mount should inherit ownership from the parent into which it was propagated.
That sounds good if everyone agrees?
Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |