Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) | From | "Pekka Enberg" <> | Date | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:10:30 +0300 (EEST) |
| |
On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > In principle, we could add suspend2 as an alternative (in analogy with the I/O > schedulers, for example), but I think for this purpose it should be reviewed > properly.
Yeah, this makes sense.
On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > There also is a real problem with how it uses the LRU pages. It _seems_ to > work, but at least to me it seems to be potentially dangerous.
I am new to suspend2 so can you please explain what exactly is dangerous about it?
Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |