lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:17:12PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
    > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 23:24 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
    >
    > > I believe uswsusp user/kernel separation is clean enough. Kernel
    > > provides "snapshot image" and "resume image". (Thanks go to Rafael for
    > > very clean interface).
    >
    > The interface isn't even 64/32-bit compatible...

    It's not . And it's one of the worst interface I've seen lately.
    Did anyone actually review this crap before it went in? I completely
    agree with Linus that these kind of boundaries that lead to horribly
    complex ioctl interface are totally wrong.

    Now suspend2 wasn't exactly nice either when I last reviewed it,
    but we should probably give it another attempt if we can sort out
    a proper incremental merge.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-26 13:39    [W:4.085 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site