[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
    On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:32:06AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new
    > > scripts/spot-common-mistakes.  Feed it a unified diff and it would complain
    > > about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted
    > > whitespace, adds new semaphores, adds new kernel_thread calls, etc, etc.
    > Might serve as a starting point for this. It doesn't have any semantic
    > checks right now, but I guess they can be added.

    Had run this utility against my battery patches, and caught
    bunch of false positives (I believe).

    +#define BATTERY_PROP(bat, prop) ({ \
    + void *value = bat->get_property(bat, BATTERY_PROP_##prop); \
    + value ? *(int*)value : 0; \

    Got: "Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while

    I believed ({}) is equivalent for "do - while", it's widely used in

    + switch (bp) {
    + default: break;
    + };

    Got "Gotos should not be indented", at "default: break;"

    +static int bind_pst_to_psy(struct power_supplicant *pst,
    + struct power_supply *psy)

    Got "use tabs not spaces". Here spaces intentionally used for
    formatting purpose, not for the indenting.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-26 03:47    [W:0.022 / U:12.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site