Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:41:06 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) |
| |
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:25:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > And even 3W would still be a waste of energy. > > > > .. but if the alternative is a feature that just isn't worth it, and > > likely to not only have its own bugs, but cause bugs elsewhere? (And yes, > > I believe STD is both of those. There's a reason it's called "STD". Go > > to google and type "STD" and press "I'm feeling lucky". Google is God). > > Is there really no use case for STD?
I use it all the time. The batteries only seem to last a day or so in STR.
Plus one is supposed to power off all electrical equipment during takeoff and landing.
> No worries if power is completely lost.
To change batteries.
> Some people might boot Windows between suspending and resuming.
I use that often too. (But I won't when I get around to upgrading the X driver to get the VaioOfDeath's external video output working under Linux)
I don't think I need a fancy splash screen tho. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |