[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] fix abs() macro to work with types wider than int
    John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
    >>>> I think it's like it is just to be consistent with abs() in C,
    >>>> which also contains labs() and llabs().
    >>> We actually had labs() before (few months ago), but since it was not
    >>> used, and if it would it seemed better to just fix abs(), it was
    >>> removed. So I think this is the appropriate way to go.
    >> Sounds like when someone actually needs labs() or llabs()
    >> they can submit a patch for however they would like to use it.
    > However they would like to use *abs()? What different ways are possible to
    > take the arithmetic absolute value? I see record of many cases where
    > dozens of authors have macros that then get collapsed to include files. So
    > why not avoid that annoyance this time and -start- with it in the include
    > files?
    > Can there even be any reason beyond unnecessary pedantics to have
    > [l[l]]abs?

    See Paragraph 1 above. We do lots of functions in a manner that is
    like C (or libc) so that we don't confuse developers.

    *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-25 17:39    [W:0.034 / U:51.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site