lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH -mm take4 2/6] support multiple logging
>> We don't really have anything that corresponds to netpoll's
>> connections at higher levels.
>>
>> I'm tempted to say we should make this work more like the dummy
>> network device. ie:
>>
>> modprobe netconsole -o netcon1 [params]
>> modprobe netconsole -o netcon2 [params]
>
> The configuration of netconsole's looks like the configuration of routes.
> Granted you probably have more routes than netconsoles, but the interface
> issues are similar. Netlink with a small application wouldn't be nice.
> And having /proc/net/netconsole (read-only) would be good for the netlink
> impaired.

Do you say that we had better use procfs instead of sysfs to show the
configurations of netconsole?

If so, I have a question.
I thought that "procfs use things related to process as far as possible".
Is it no problem to use procfs here?

--
Keiichi KII
NEC Corporation OSS Promotion Center
E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 10:19    [W:0.110 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site