Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:14:50 +0900 | From | Keiichi KII <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm take4 2/6] support multiple logging |
| |
>> We don't really have anything that corresponds to netpoll's >> connections at higher levels. >> >> I'm tempted to say we should make this work more like the dummy >> network device. ie: >> >> modprobe netconsole -o netcon1 [params] >> modprobe netconsole -o netcon2 [params] > > The configuration of netconsole's looks like the configuration of routes. > Granted you probably have more routes than netconsoles, but the interface > issues are similar. Netlink with a small application wouldn't be nice. > And having /proc/net/netconsole (read-only) would be good for the netlink > impaired.
Do you say that we had better use procfs instead of sysfs to show the configurations of netconsole?
If so, I have a question. I thought that "procfs use things related to process as far as possible". Is it no problem to use procfs here?
-- Keiichi KII NEC Corporation OSS Promotion Center E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |