[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
Rogan Dawes wrote:

> My concern was that since Ingo said that this is a closed economy, with
> a fixed sum/total, if we lose a nanosecond here and there, eventually
> we'll lose them all.

I assume Ingo has set it up so that the system doesn't "lose" partial
nanoseconds, but rather they'd just be accounted to the wrong task.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 17:21    [W:0.121 / U:17.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site