[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
>> yeah, i guess this has little to do with X. I think in your scenario
>> it might have been smarter to either stop, or to renice the workloads
>> that took away CPU power from others to _positive_ nice levels.
>> Negative nice levels can indeed be dangerous.
>btw., was X itself at nice 0 or nice -10 when the lockup happened?
> Ingo

Memory could be hazy Ingo, but I think X was at 0 when that occurred.

Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
I use technology in order to hate it more properly.
-- Nam June Paik
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 16:43    [W:0.137 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site