[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Gene Heskett <> wrote:
>> > (Btw., to protect against such mishaps in the future i have changed
>> > the SysRq-N [SysRq-Nice] implementation in my tree to not only
>> > change real-time tasks to SCHED_OTHER, but to also renice negative
>> > nice levels back to 0 - this will show up in -v6. That way you'd
>> > only have had to hit SysRq-N to get the system out of the wedge.)
>> That sounds handy, particularly with idiots like me at the wheel...
>by that standard i guess we tinkerers are all idiots ;)
> Ingo


Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Man's horizons are bounded by his vision.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-24 16:39    [W:0.119 / U:10.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site