lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] introduce HIGH_ORDER delineating easily reclaimable orders
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:28:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> It would have been better to have patched page_alloc.c independently, then
>> to have used HIGH_ORDER in "lumpy: increase pressure at the end of the inactive
>> list".
>
> Actually that doesn't matter, because I plan on lumping all the lumpy patches
> together into one lump.
>
> I was going to duck patches #2 and #3, such was my outrage. But given that
> it's all lined up to be a single patch, followup cleanup patches will fit in
> OK. Please.

Yes. Its funny how you can get so close to a change that you can no
longer see the obvious warts on it.

I am actually travelling today, so it'll be tommorrow now. But I'll
roll the cleanups and get them to you. I can also offer you a clean
drop in lumpy stack with the HIGH_ORDER change pulled out to the top
once you are happy.

-apw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-23 12:25    [W:0.028 / U:1.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site