[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    On 04/04/2007 06:38 PM, Rene Herman wrote:


    > On 04/04/2007 06:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
    >>> Given that people seem to agree that authorship information has no
    >>> place in the binary, that might actually be best.
    >> Authorship information is very useful in the binary, especially when you
    >> have to get lawyers involved in explaining things to people.
    > Okay.
    >>> So, MODULE_AUTHOR be gone?
    >> Not if I have anything to do with it. Putting maintainer in is not a
    >> bad idea but that assumes it gets maintained, the beauty of _AUTHOR
    >> is that it's generally right and stays that way or approximately so.
    > Case in point; someone is working with me in private on a new "mitsumi"
    > legacy CD-ROM driver. He's authoring the actual driver and upto now I've
    > just been doing some peripheral module infrastructure work. Given that I
    > have the hardware to test the thing, I'll be the maintainer though.
    > Adding myself as a MODULE_AUTHOR would be largely incorrect and adding
    > myself as the _only_ MODULE_AUTHOR would be so factually incorrect I
    > wouldn't, even if only from a credits point of view. Yet I do want to
    > make sure people contact me, and not the MODULE_AUTHOR (which will
    > happen no matter the MAINTAINERS file).
    > Other cases-in-point; I've lately been rummaging through sound/isa a
    > bit. Nothing much copyrightable again but especially in those situations
    > where (some of the) original authors are no longer active, I do again
    > want people to contact me about them if needed. And all the "which one
    > of the three people listed here is maintaining this" is yet another.
    > MODULE_AUTHOR may be approximately right but especially with old drivers
    > it also has little relation with who's maintaining the thing.
    > If MODULE_AUTHOR stays, can I just have MODULE_MAINTAINER please? It
    > doesn't need to be added to drivers directly, it can just grow (and
    > being inside the code, I suppose it'll likely stay up to date better
    > than the MAINTAINERS file).


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-04-23 11:39    [W:0.022 / U:168.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site