lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in CDU-31A driver
El Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:25:58AM +0200 Andi Kleen ha dit:

> Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > -static DECLARE_MUTEX(sony_sem); /* Semaphore for drive hardware access */
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sony_mtx); /* Mutex for drive hardware access */
>
> That's not a spinlock. Also normally some rationale is added to the
> description for a change?

sorry i messed up the description of the change, i meant mutex instead
of spinlock (in the last days i reported some spinlock related bugs
...).

the rationale is that according to http://lwn.net/Articles/167034/
binary semaphores that aren't given in interrupt context or
locked and unlocked by different processes should be replaced by
mutexes

thanks for your comments

--
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona

La posibilidad de realizar un suenyo es lo
que hace que la vida sea interesante
.''`.
using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org : :' :
`. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4 `-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-23 07:41    [W:0.047 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site