Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:00:32 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: MODULE_MAINTAINER |
| |
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:33 +0200, Rene Herman wrote: > > > On 04/04/2007 06:38 PM, Rene Herman wrote: > > > > > > Rusty? > > > > Valid points have been made on both sides. I suggest: > > > > #define MODULE_MAINTAINER(_maintainer) \ > > MODULE_AUTHOR("(Maintained by) "_maintainer) > > why bring MODULE_AUTHOR into it? just define it in terms of > MODULE_INFO: > > #define MODULE_MAINTAINER(_m) MODULE_INFO(_m, "(Maintained by)" \ > maintainer)
whoops, the above is obviously syntactically incorrect, but you get the idea regarding MODULE_INFO, right?
rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |