lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> well, i just simulated a runaway X at nice -19 on CFS (on a UP box), and
> while the box was a tad laggy, i was able to killall it without
> problems, within 2 seconds that also included a 'su'. So it's not an
> issue in CFS, it can be turned off, and because every distro has another
> way to renice Xorg, this is a convenience hack until Xorg standardizes
> it into some xorg.conf field. (It also makes sure that X isnt preempted
> by other userspace stuff while it does timing-sensitive operations like
> setting the video modes up or switching video modes, etc.)

Good!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-22 15:33    [W:0.140 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site