Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:00:26 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 |
| |
* Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> > i've attached it below in a standalone form, feel free to put it > > into SD! :) > > Assume X went crazy (lacking any statistics, I make the unproven > statement that this happens more often than kthreads going berserk), > then having it niced with minus something is not too nice.
i've not experienced a 'runaway X' personally, at most it would crash or lock up ;) The value is boot-time and sysctl configurable as well back to 0.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |