lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on:
>
> (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a
> problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there that I
> don't know about.
>
> (2) try_to_cancel_delayed_work(). I suppose I could use
> cancel_delayed_work() instead, but that's less efficient as it waits for
> the timer completion function to finish.

There are significant workqueue changes in -mm and I plan to send them
in for 2.6.22. I doubt if there's anything in there which directly
affects cancel_delayed_work(), but making changes of this nature against
2.6.21 might lead to grief.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-04-20 20:43    [W:0.131 / U:49.844 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site