Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:49:32 -0500 | Subject | Re: Failure! Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues | From | (Florin Iucha) |
| |
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests > > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the > > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your > > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right? > > The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4 > request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has > occurred, or the server sends us garbage.
I have to mention that I rebased to the head of the tree (895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a) before applying your patches, in order to test what I expect the official tree to be.
Tonight I'll test this kernel once more, then go back to 21-rc7 and apply your 5 patches and re-test.
florin
-- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |